Measuring IPTV QOS (Quality Of Service)

IPTV QOS is a topic that has become a confusing issue for many businesses, let’s clear it up.

Quality Of Service, being something new often makes people automatically think of using pre-existing measurement techniques. This basic starting point for QOS measurement is where most of the confusion is generated.

In the same way that when companies began moving from Analogue to digital broadcast signals, the natural tendency of the existing engineers was to want to measure the new digital signal by converting it back to analogue and then using their existing equipment. Core IPTV QOS has caused a lot of the same methodology, whereby engineers with a network background want to measure network statistics, and engineers with a video background want to measure video statistics. The former (network engineers) can happily take their measurements from the existing network infrastructure, but get no feeling for what packets on the network relate to what video signals. The video people want to convert the IPTV signal back into its digital video format (converting it from IP to Video), which really misses the point that all you’re really finding out is how well the converting device works (a piece of test equipment won’t be comparable to the way an STB (set-top box) would decode the signal. Thus, you have two separate approaches to the same problem – neither of which is ideal.

Now, there IS a place for existing test equipment (network test equipment is great for data traffic as it always was, and Transport Stream (digital video) analysers are great at your Head-End (where the video content originates) in order to confirm that the video into your IP network was good), so it’s not time to throw it away, it’s just not the right tool for IPTV QOS.
With those comments out of the way, we can move forward (it’s difficult to move when you still have one foot in your old mindset).

Depending on who you are, you could very well be concerned with just one part of an IPTV system or the entire system, so we’ll break it into the core problem and what that means at each place in the network (we’ll assign the network 4 test points: 1) Head End 2) Core Network 3) Network Edge 4) Customer Home).

1) Head End.

This might concern you if you are responsible for creating, providing, or receiving video from a Head End.

A Head End can consist of anything from professional video encoders to VOD Servers (Video On Demand) and could be in one of many video formats, compression types, bitrates etc. They could be Unicast or Multicast, UDP, RTP or a proprietary mechanism (As in the case of MSTV).

Whatever the situation, it’s a good idea to take steps to ensure that the Head End is robust and that the video encoding devices are reliable. A problem at the Head End affects everyone down the line, right to the customer. (we’ll assume that various ‘redundant’ systems are in place to avoid this type of problem where possible)

Having built the Head End System with a robust architecture, the last thing (and the important one for us) is to monitor the Head End IP video flow output to ensure that this first point where the video is IP encapsulated has been done adequately and that the rest of the IPTV infrastructure can rely on this input.

Note: One common mistake at this point (and elsewhere) is to have some sort of round-robin system in place where not all of the video streams are measured at the same time – this should only be done if necessary as one of the ‘issues’ with the nature of IP delivery over a network is that impairments caused to the signal in the IP domain have a non-deterministic effect on the video flows. This means that while you’re looking at 5 of 100 flows, you could be having problems on some random number of other flows which you wouldn’t see – unless you monitor ALL flows simultaneously.

2) Core Network.

Hopefully the steps above will have been done, so if you’re concerned with the core network, your main work involves doing your own verification that the flows coming into your network are OK (you can’t rely on the Head End provider to do this for you, and it’s much easier to be able to get out of the spotlight when problems occur if you can easily confirm your input), and ensuring that the passage across the network doesn’t cause any loss or excessive jitter (the only 2 components that can stop the network getting your video to the end intact.

Now that we’re in the IP domain, this issue of packet loss is ultimately the number 1 thing to look out for (any IP packets lost WILL mean video content loss since all mechanisms insert video packets into IP packets for delivery, some even contain up to 7 video packets in one IP packet). However, with that said, every network device (and ultimately the STB) have buffers which means that excessive jitter can cause packet loss. Since we don’t want packet loss, this means jitter is just as important to us when monitoring our system.

The real kicker here is that if you’re from the old school of IP monitoring you’ll be pretty happy with what I’ve said so far – but there’s one thing which makes thing a little more ‘interesting’. It is perfectly possible to lose ‘media’ packets but NOT IP packets. Whenever an infrastructure includes elements like multiplexers which combine the MPEG video and ‘MUX’ several streams into one, if you’re not doing some form of ‘deep packet inspection’ (looking into the media headers to ensure the continuity counters are correct) you could have no IP packet loss, but still have video problems. This means that your solution cannot come from one approach or the other, but needs to do the monitoring in the IP domain while still confirming that the media packets are intact.

This additional complication is one of the things that many test equipment manufacturers haven’t accounted for, usually because this is still a fairly new field and many equipment vendors are focused on creating ‘features’ rather than addressing the customer problems to deliver benefits which give them the robust solutions required.

3) Network Edge.

As before, our first step is to confirm our input is good by monitoring all flows simultaneously for jitter and packet loss and then ensuring that the ‘last mile’ mechanism to the customer home is as robust as possible.

Since this step could easily involve conversion from IP to RF (cable companies us RF (Radio Frequency) signals instead of the copper or fibre cables that most network equipment uses, any test equipment may need an appropriate interface for this (the most common interface here is QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation) of which there are 3 main types (they’re actually called ‘Annex’s’) Annex A, B, and C for US, Europe and Asia.

So depending on your infrastructure here, you may or may not have an IP network to the customer home.

4) Customer Home.

The final and some would say the most important part of the system.

As before, we need to check our input (the IP video flows that are about to go to the customers STB). Since we’re talking about IP, again this is all about the jitter and packet loss that has occurred to those video flows on their journey to this home. Since we checked the video quality as it was encoded at the head end, we know that as long as the jitter isn’t too much for the STB to cope with, and there’s no packet loss – the video will be exactly as it was when it was encoded.

If you’re wondering how to get around this – there are equipment vendors with devices that go IN the customer home and abstract the workload from the STB and even some that let the customer press a button to signal when THEY saw a problem (regardless of what your test equipment may or may not have indicated – who says you need to simulate a customer experience)

That’s true, but in real life, most companies don’t own, control or even have access to the entire system. This makes rolling out an IPTV deployment a bit of a nightmare unless you understand the issues and have the appropriate test equipment (remember, some people still have one foot in the network or video world of old).

When companies do have access to large parts of the system or are working with friendly companies that do, this headache can get a whole lot easier when the equipment being used can have its data fed into a central video monitoring system. This way, the 2 common problems of 1) Where is the problem 2) Is it an IP problem, are visible at a glance and much wasted time and effort just getting to the point where you even know where the problem is can be avoided.

When it comes to wanting to quantify the quality of the system, there are several standards for assessing IPTV, the most common are 1) V-Factor 2) MOS 3) MDI

1) V-Factor

V-Factor is a system that uses Moving Picture Quality Metrics (MPQM) research to try and simulate what a human would have decided the video quality was like.

This is an interesting method and is one way to approach the problem, but requires a lot of processing, cannot realistically be done across most of the network (since the processing work is heavy, this does not lend itself to ‘core’ or ‘head-end’ monitoring), so might serve as a useful measurement to integrate into STBs.

Since we’re looking at a holistic IPTV QOS approach, only a monitoring solution that gives us the big picture, as well as the detail, will do.

2) MOS (Mean Opinion Score)

Again, this metric is designed to try and give an approximation of what a human would see.

As with the V-Factor, it’s a cool idea and technically excellent but doesn’t tell us what is wrong with the system (it’s nice to have a quality ‘score’, but in reality, we need to know what to DO about a ‘poor’ score).

3) MDI (Media Delivery Index)

As the name suggests, we get a metric that tells us something about the delivery. (xx: yy, where xx equates to the cumulative jitter and yy, equates to packet loss) This time, rather than trying to analyse the video and ‘score’ it, we get data about the jitter and packet loss at the point being measured. While it might not study the decoded video signal, it does tell us how well the video has been delivered – which if you remember is the most important thing if it was encoded properly.

MDI is an appropriate metric at any point in the system and would let us know immediately if there was a delivery problem. Since the MDI values are based on the bitrates of the video streams, this also gives us some really useful information about how different streams will be affected by our network (for example, if we’re already running 50 SD (Standard Definition) Streams and we want to replace them with HD (High Definition) streams, a V-Factor or MOS score at some point in our network won’t tell us what to expect, whereas MDI metrics will let us know how much difference the network is likely to make. The jitter on the network will affect SD and HD stream differently (in fact, any streams with different bitrates will be differently affected by the jitter – this causes many problems), so having information about the way the jitter is affecting the IP delivery is REALLY useful information, that you just don’t get with the other measuring systems.

I hope you find this article useful and take the steps to ensure a reliable system before you get ‘deployment headaches’. Another article will follow shortly describing how to build a robust IPTV network.

Usability of E Commerce Web Design

The World Wide Web has offered a new platform of business. In the past, hardly some business concerns could trade globally. But, with the introduction of the web, there has been a drastic revolution in the market trends. Today, business companies make websites to reach millions across the world. Small business enterprises are equally competing with big multinational companies to make their presence felt in the web world.

Increased competition across the cyber market has sped up the growth of new technological development. The obvious outcome was an attempt to devise new ways to make the website more user-friendly. E-commerce web design became the ideal choice of business concerns for its flexibility and user-friendliness profitable Shopify websites for sale.

Usability

One of the most important features of an e-commerce web design is that it is very much user-friendly. Moreover, an e-commerce website is a highly feasible solution for web owners. Certain basic usability of e-commerce website design are stated below:

* Easy product upload – New products of sale can be easily put up on the web page. These new goodies stored in the database of the website is uploaded in no time according to requirement.

* Quick price modification – The prices of goods displayed on the web page can be easily modified. According to market standards, the prices of commodities have become lower or higher.

* Easy transaction of goods payment – Payment of commodities is done through the Internet. Customer payment is directly deposited in the owner’s account.

* World market – Websites make an indefinable presence in the global market. Successful e-commerce websites create a favourable image of the business company in the eyes of global consumers.

* Cost-effective – An e-commerce website is highly cost-effective for the web owner. Web owners can trade with their global customers with great ease. These web owners are not harried of setting up the business location, manpower etc.

* Fast marketing – Web user can easily shop on the Internet. The products of sale are displayed on-screen within seconds. The web users order their requirements through the shopping cart facility.

* Highly convenient – It is the most convenient kind of shopping. The web user can market products according to choice sitting in a remote room from various websites across the world.

* Less time-consuming – Internet marketing is very less time-consuming. Web users can easily shop within less time.

Ways to make an e-commerce web design usable

Business cannot grow if it fails to satisfy the needs and desires of prospective consumers. An e-commerce website must offer easy accessibility to its customers. Some guidelines to design a usable e-commerce website design.

1.”Bill of Rights”: The company must have ready information about the fact that it is working in conformity with the laws of the trade. It is extremely essential to provide prospective consumers with details that the website has been designed only to meet their needs.

2.Easy navigation: It becomes essential that an e-commerce web design must offer prospective users the liberty to easily navigate through the web pages. E-commerce websites contain numerous products of sale. Web designers must design according to the needs of the customers. The web users must be able to browse the products of sale through name, price and data with ease.

3. Clear business policies: An e-commerce website design of a website must demonstrate the business policies of the company. Make clear conditions concerning the purchase of products, the entire shipping process which is convenient for the user.

4. Earn the trust of the consumers: It very difficult to earn the trust of the customers. There is no direct communication between the web owners and the users. It was important to provide the users with all possible information such as telephone number, postal address.

5. Simple checkout process: Web designers must simply design the check out process. The user must not face any difficulty in the last phase of the transaction process. Generally, the users turn to other sites and the obvious result is that there is the web site meets a fatal end.

6. Simple and organized design: A cluttered web design creates confusion in the visitor’s mind. Web users tend to turn to other sites, which offer easy access. An e-commerce web design must be simple and organized so that web users can easily access the site.

eCommerce web design has been witnessing huge technological changes. With increased competition, web designs are constructed to provide the consumers with state- of – the – art facilities to be more at ease. A usable e-commerce website design is more attractive to the consumers and the most successful one.

Security Operations Center (SOC)

The SOC model is a lot of integral arrangements that are measured, adaptable and intended to enable you to foresee, recognize and react to cutting edge dangers, alongside strong arrangements and experienced security specialists to help alleviate hazards and guarantee productive administration of your ICT vulnerabilities. The SOC will explicitly concentrate on digital dangers observing, examination, robotization, episode the executives and reaction, risk knowledge, dim web checking, DNS Security, revealing and so forth, under the umbrella of a general security activities condition and clear official help.

Digital Security Tasks The executives

Assaults have developed altogether in multifaceted nature, rendering most of ‘Off the Rack’ discovery arrangements insufficient. Moreover, because of cutting edge subterfuge procedures, malware frequently goes unnoticed by framework directors in spite of being noticeable to experienced specialists. We need to depend on the human factor, for example, the investigators, to defeat the advanced aggressors.

A Security Activities Center (SOC) or Digital Security Tasks Center (CSOC) is the operational hub of a Digital Security Activities Program. The SOC involves Individuals, Procedures and Innovations that give situational mindfulness through identification, control and remediation of digital security dangers. Staffed all day, every day by experienced security specialists and experts, utilizing top tier Security Data and Occasion The board (SIEM) Programming, Constant Helplessness Appraisal devices, Risk Insight administration, DDoS Assurance, Hostile to phishing for Email, Against phishing and Hostile to Trojan for Systems, noxious action is recognized, and dangers are taken care of proactively.

NDV’s AiCyberWatch Overseen SOC Services in India Administrations

DVs AiCyberWatch consolidates Best of Breed Security Instruments from world pioneers like LogRhythm, Section, F5, Cloudflare, and so on with our exclusive Man-made consciousness, AI and Huge Information empowered stage to convey world-class Oversaw CSOC Administrations. AI handles huge information volumes following huge information systems enabling unique flexibility to any condition for profound information examination.

Man-made reasoning guarantees just applicable and important cautions with expanded exactness are featured alongside noteworthy knowledge for risk regulation and end, generally requiring reliance on security experts for investigation from scores of danger markers with a plausibility of passing up a great opportunity significant alarms.

As an AiCyberWatch client, your Organization can appreciate the true serenity that accompanies a day in and day out SOC inclusion giving ongoing checking, progressed the logical investigation, and better permeability through modified reports and dashboards to proactively forestall, identify, and address security dangers.

As an AiCyberWatch accomplice or re-vender, you can win new clients and increment income by offering White name Security Tasks Center as a Help (SOCaaS). It is a savvy approach to ensure your clients, without the problem of building your very own SOC, yet fabricating your image.

With our easy to use online entryway, you can see the security condition of your benefits, just as cautions, occurrences, and consistency levels. All our Oversaw administrations pursue the NIST Digital Security System. We give committed nearby, mixture and remotely oversaw SOC administrations for customers and accomplices over a scope of industry parts. We give adaptable contributions, great client care, guarantee to set mindful help and give the correct harmony between receptive checking and proactive danger chasing.

The AiCyberWatch administration makes it progressively moderate for Little and Medium undertakings to exploit Venture Evaluation Security administrations at a small amount of the expense.

The Three Components of NDV’s AiCyberWatch SOC as a Help advertising

NDV comprehends that The SOC involves Individuals, Procedures and Advances that give situational mindfulness through recognition, regulation and remediation of digital security dangers. The following are the 5 key innovation segments that are a piece of our Oversaw AiCyberWatch administrations.

The best free YouTube downloader

Free YouTube Downloader is a little yet compelling application that rapidly downloads recordings with no hiccups. While the plan is very plain, and there aren’t numerous highlights, this application gives you precisely what you need when you need it.

HOME WINDOWS Web Programming DOWNLOAD Directors FREE YOUTUBE DOWNLOADER

Pengunduh youtube

Tapping on the Download Presently (Visit Website) button above will open an association with an outsider webpage. Download.com can’t guarantee the security of the product facilitated on third-get-together destinations.

CBS Intuitive doesn’t empower or overlook the unlawful duplication or dispersion of copyrighted content.

KEY Subtleties OF FREE YOUTUBE DOWNLOADER

Download YouTube recordings and convert to various arrangements

Keep going refreshed on 10/30/19

There include been 3 updates inside the previous a half year

The present variant has 0 banners on VirusTotal badge_icon

Free YouTube Downloader is a little however successful application that rapidly downloads recordings with no hiccups. While the structure is very plain, and there aren’t numerous highlights, this application gives you precisely what you need when you need it.

What Do You Have To Think About Free Programming?

Aces

Quick downloads: We utilized Free YouTube downloader to snatch a variety of recordings and not even once encountered any postponements. All downloads, paying little mind to yield group, protected the nature of the first video.

Simple to utilize: This application is clear, particularly with its uncomplicated plan. The huge URL window and restricted measure of catches make downloading recordings a simple errand. It is altogether contained inside one window, diminishing disarray enormously.

Accommodating support: This application offers an accommodating on the web direct, which incorporates photographs and nitty-gritty portrayals, just as a functioning gathering where you can pose inquiries about Free YouTube Downloader.

CONS

Restricted: This program plays out its proposed capacity consummately, however, it would be decent on the off chance that it bolstered other video facilitating Sites.

Primary concern

Free YouTube Downloader does precisely what it guarantees, offering a simple method to download recordings. If you use YouTube for all your video needs, this is the ideal download. If you need a device that will download recordings from different locales, you might need to evaluate different alternatives.

PUBLISHER’S Portrayal

From HOW:

OK prefer to watch your preferred recordings from YouTube at whatever point and any place you please? With this download chief, you can spare YouTube recordings in different video and sound organizations including AAC, MP3, AVI and MP4.

This product is 100% allowed to utilize and is ensured not to contain any spyware, infections or some other sort of malware. Since we work all day on this product we have to incorporate supported offers. We trust you comprehend this is important to give this item gratis. Any offers can undoubtedly be declined so nothing will ever be introduced without your assent.

Skip to toolbar